@salmoncashew1785

lakers caught a wild stray 😭

@MUCK-the-monster-addict

The reason for this being slower than expected is the water has been colored blue which made it sad and when its sad it takes a bit more motivation from gravity to get it out

@cg-lk2bz

I took the over because i've been in college and know that funnels never empty as fast as you expect them to 😅

@SuperMattMan03

Friction/attraction to plastic walls as well as turbulence can account for the difference in time.

@MisterJackTheAttack

I was like "i don't feel like doing that calculus...oh you did do it? I'll take the over."

@Damienkpruitt

Buddy I just use my imagination and think how long it would take 😭

@kind0person

What i learnt:2×4 
The test:

@RealCapybaraOfficial

His reasoning “advanced mathematics”
My reasoning “because of its shape it will take approximately longer than he said”

@loganjeffery7030

As an engineering student i took the over initally, after his explanation of how the base was calculated i knew my choice was right because 4.5 was the best case scenario when not accounting for, fluid drag, friction with the walls, turbulance. And the best case scenario never happens, much less a better than perfect scenario lmao

@MM126.90

Over: No matter how good your math is, there’s always one random variable that going to slow everything down.

@billclinton984

bro just violated the lakers for no reason

@hadensnodgrass3472

I won that bet handedly. 

PS: Your equations didn't account for turbulence. If the liquid was spinning before removing the cork, it would have minimized the turbulence, and 4.5 seconds might have been dead on.

@bland9876

For those that are wondering yes you can refill the top of it before the bottom part drains and if you keep doing that enough you'll never get the funnel to be empty.

PS they do this with electricity and it's called a capacitor.

@David-oo4yf

That Lakers shot was wild 😂

@roguehades2348

That’s actually cool cause whilst Bernoulli’s equation is “decent” at modelling fluids it doesn’t take into account viscosity like the navier stokes equation. However stokes doesn’t take into account the attraction between the water and the funnel, but I think for this purpose it’ll be negligible.

@choose282

As soon as you said you were using exit velocity I took the over. I'm no mathlete but I feel very strongly that exit velocity should fall as the water pressure goes down

@Alius_Bullshitus

Pov: viscosity entered the chat

@MrChilili

I took over bc if it’s 4.5 in perfect conditions, anything imperfect will make it longer

@DreadEnder

I like this science version of your channel.

@nickgerr8982

The only flaw that gave me the over call was its not perfect flow. If you did this with a variable pressure over the top of the funnel that goes up as water flows out, you'd get exactly your calculated 4.5 secs.