@DirtyMedicine

Just for clarification,  yes obviously the numerator does NOT have to be > the denominator in criteria #1 and #2 since the cutoffs are 0.5 and 0.6, hence it can be a true exudative criteria even with a larger denominator than numerator. However, the point I was trying to illustrate is that as you increase the relative number of Protein or LDH (hence the numerator gets relatively larger, not necessarily larger than the denominator) you can better conceptualize the clinical context in which you'd have exudative effusions.

@Scorlng

I hope you know you’re the GOAT.  You’ve made medical school actually reasonable with word association. Thank you so much bro you’re the man.  Thank you to my big brother who showed me your videos.

@g-mannG

Amazing Doc, thanks so much 🎉

@user-pz6rc4pg6l

U just posted this while i was going through ur video on electron transport chain 😊

@timoritofau

U know exams are getting more BS when DirtyMed has to bust out a lights criteria video!

@GammaKnife17

the GOAT Is back

@mohamedhassan-vd6xd

goodness Iam medical Dr and I'm new to your vedio , iam really really appreciated something is wrong with me so far that's my dx. 
brother very respect to you nothing else I could say 
I wish brother you study about slam and Quran I wish.. god guide you to the right path ....

@MohamedAElHefny

نحبككك

@Humbleman7

Thank you Doctor

@DrWhoIsHere

Thanks!🙏🏻

@mohammedkaif5522

Do I need to know apperance of fluid to answer questions and cause of it?

@souvikmandal814

You just need to learn maths bro..its absolute disgrace